'It's not your imagination ... who's there?'
Mark Fisher
Steve Goodman's presentation at the excellent hauntology event
last week focused on the phenomenon of 'audio spotlights', which
deploy ultrasound to precisely target sonic messages at
individuals. Predictably, the use of this Philip K Dick-like
'holosonic' technology - explained in the YouTube clip above - is
being pioneered by advertisers to cut through the urban cacophony
to reach consumers as they pass billboards.
It's interesting that the 'related videos' on YouTube are
predominantly not about technological developments but the
paranormal - not surprising when you watch the clip below, which
shows how advertisers have insinuated an insistent voice saying
'It's not your imagination ... who's there?' into the heads of
passersby. (I'm reminded of Carpenter's Prince Of Darkness
, in which technicians transmit a message into the sleeping mind of
the receiving subjects, saying 'This is not a dream'.)
It as if the voice flips from being a voice in your head - an invading signal, performatively announcing its own reality (it's not your imagination) - to being thevoice in your head - your 'own' 'inner' voice, asking who's there? On the face of it, this seems to be another vindication of Althusser's theory of subjectivity as an effect of hailing (or interpellation). But, as someone in the audience at the Hauntology event suggested, in projecting itself directly into your head, the holosonic hail almost risks schizophrenically subverting the interpellation process. Instead of the standard (mis)recognition of oneself as the object of a hail, the holosonic projection could invite a recognition that what you thought of as your 'inner voice' does not belong to interiority at all.
The laser-like targeting of sound contrasted fascinatingly with a protest by Unite, the Trade Union, outside a building near to The Wire's offices last week. In pursuit of minimal workers' rights for the building's cleaners - such as paid holiday/ sicknesses - the protest was an exercise in noise generation, using the voice, whistles and improvised percussion in an effort to disrupt the working ambience of City drones. Unfortunately, I don't know how successful it was, either in its aim of distracting the smooth flow of capitalist immaterial labour - maybe the building was too effectively sound-insulated for the noise to penetrate - or in getting the cleaners' demands met. But here are two illustrations of the way in which sound - at least as much as images - is crucial to the management of contemporary social reality. While the role of images has been endlessly discussed, the role of sound remains undertheorised. What, for instance, is the sonic equivalent of the visual Spectacle?
Tags: Uncategorized
'Other People Went To University...'
Mark Fisher
![]() |
![]() |
If you're a cod-psychologist, I guess you could trace most of the Fall's output back to this period, to the wilderness years, the dole days - back to young Mark laying the hard foundations for the rough and brilliant years that he hasn't yet seen!
Mark E Smith, from a section of his autobiography, which is being serialised in The Guardian this week. Who knows how much culture in postwar, pre-neoliberal Britain depended on the indirect public funding – perhaps the best kind – provided by the dole? Of course, in the wake of Thatcherism and Blairism, today's equivalents of the young MES would find themselves quickly harassed back to work in a cracker factory by a Restart course. (Aptly, one of The Fall's many members was actually an extra in the scenes set in the Restart course in The League of Gentlemen.) The dole might have provided an alternative to university, a time in which proletarian autodidacts could pursue undirected research and engage in rogue reflections, but with the cutting of student grants and the introduction of tuition fees, the pause for thought which existed outside employment and official study is no longer available to many British students either.
Tags: Uncategorized
12 hour party people
Mark Fisher
Uber Germanist
Owen weighs into the debate on minimal:
This perhaps makes sense of the link between minimal and hedonism
that Philip Sherburne often insists upon. On the face of it,
minimal is an extremely unlikely candidate to be considered a
pleasure seekers' music. It's worth noting at this juncture, that,
as Derek pointed out after my last post, there is very little
'tasteful' about a Villalobos, Luciano or Hawtin set – what appears
tasteful at normal volume becomes something different when put
through a club PA. Nevertheless, even at high volume, there is a
certain restraint at work here – or perhaps it is better construed
as an avoidance (of hooks, big riffs etc.) It could be that this
avoidance of the hedonic spikes, the pleasure peaks, of music is
the libidinal cost of distending pleasure over the course of a
twelve hour party.
Berlin has in many ways become a capital of deterritorialized
culture, a base for DJs and curators whose jetsetting lifestyle is
indeed a "bizarre phenomenon". If hauntology depends upon
the way that very specific places – Burial's South London Boroughs,
for instance – are stained with particular times, then the affect
that underlies minimal might be characterised as
nomadalgia: a lack of sense of place, a drift through club
or salon spaces that, like franchise coffee bars, could be
anywhere.
Tags: Uncategorized
Return to the fairground
Mark Fisher
"Minimal, of course, was the straw that overflowed the glass of Red Bull," writes Philip Sherburne in his jeremiad on the state of electronic dance music.
But the problem doesn't really lie with minimal itself. (One difficulty, though, is defining what minimal "itself" is; and it's questionable whether everything now labeled 'minimal' can now usefully be defined as belonging to one genre or sensibility.) As Simon Hampson argued in The Wire 293, it is the position that 'minimal' occupies in dance music, rather than any properties of the music itself, that is the issue:
There's a direct analogy with dubstep - more than an analogy, actually, since dubstep and the empire of minimal are converging, what with Villalobos and Shackleton remixing each other, the 2562 record, etc. What is needed is the confident reassertion of a dance music mainstream. That's related to Simon Reynolds's comments in Philip's piece:
Could minimal be defined as 'devoid of cheese'? Maybe so - but it would be a mistake to equate cheese with a retreat from innovation, just as it would be an error to align tasteful restraint and austerity with experimentalism. Hearing XL's rerelease of The Prodigy's first LP recently, with its its vertiginous jump cuts and bizarre angles, brought this home with E-flashback ultravividness. The barrel organ-like cartoon euphoria of Experience has always sounded like fairground music, and indeed it was at home pounding out from a fairground as it was at a rave. Wandering around a fairground in Kent recently, I kept being drawn back to the ride that was pumping out Bassline House, the genre whose hectic animatronic ebullience is at home in the fairground environment as rave once was. Is it time to forget the austere appartments that minimalism is so often reminiscent of, and return to the fairground?
Tags: Uncategorized
Ridicule Is Nothing To Be Scared Of (Slight Return)
Mark Fisher
Like
David Stubbs, I'm of course delighted to have been shopped to
the commissars of commonsense who compile Private Eye's Pseud's
Corner. It's always bracing to be middlebrow-beaten; a pleasure I
can expect to enjoy fairly regularly from now on, since, if the
section from the Mark Stewart feature that they selected is
considered fair game, then they might as well open up a permanent
spot for me.
It's difficult to know what the alleged problem is: the conjoining
of politics and music? Well, it's hardly stretching a point to
argue that a record such as For How Much Do We Tolerate Mass
Murder? might, y'know, have had some connection with
geopolitical developments at the end of the 70s. Would the same
objection be made to linkages between politics and other areas of
culture? But of course what is objected to is as much a question of
tone as of content. The default expectation in British media is
that writers perform a homely matiness: writing must be light,
upbeat and irreverent, never taking itself or anything else too
seriously.
The function of Pseud's Corner – to punish writing that in some way
overreaches itself, that gets ideas above its
station or gets carried away – has now been taken up
by online discussion boards and comments facilities everywhere. The
effect on any writer who internalises the critique is to be
intimidated into colourless mediocrity. But the problem with most
published writing today is not that it is 'pretentious', it is that
is unreflective PR hackwork. David Stubbs is right to invoke a
certain Orwell as the patron of bluff, plain speaking John Bull
prose - but the Orwell of "Politics
And The English Language" also attacked the mechanical
circulation of dull, dead language. If only that Orwell
were more heeded. "Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of
speech which you are used to seeing in print," he demanded,
optimistically hoping that "if one jeers loudly enough, send some
worn-out and useless phrase — some jackboot, Achilles’
heel, hotbed, melting pot, acid
test, veritable inferno, or other lump of verbal
refuse — into the dustbin where it belongs." Over sixty years
later, such "verbal refuse" continues to circulate with impunity,
and is supplemented by a whole inventory of PR commonplaces and
consumer-affect babble (journeys, rollercoaster
rides). Surely any amount of 'pretentiousness' is preferable
to these soporific linguistic screensavers?
Tags: Uncategorized
Anti-Epiphany
Mark Fisher
Simon's
response to Mark Wastell's Epiphany in Wire 292, fascinating
not because it is a Rashômon-like alternative reading of
the same event, but because - contrary to certain prevailing
hedonic relativist orthodoxies - it demonstrates that there is
something more involved in aesthetic judgments than a mere
registering of sensations. The difference between Mark's response
and Simon's was not at the level of pleasure; it wasn't that Mark
found Parker and Braxton any more agreeable than Simon did. But, in
Mark's case, the initially disagreeable sensations induced him to
take a leap beyond the pleasure principle: a cognitive
act, a commitment, a decision to override the 'anger and confusion'
that the music first caused him to feel.(Simon of course has taken
such leaps in respect of other scenes, other musics.)
The mantra of hedonic relativism has it that 'everything is
subjective', where subjectivity is construed as an arbitrary
set of preferences. But Mark's Epiphany vindicates the view that
certain encounters - events - produce subjectivities, even
as they destitute us, deprive us of old worlds.
Tags: Uncategorized
Namings As Portals
Mark Fisher
Speaking of postpunk autodidacticism,
Owen Hatherley picks up on what I too thought was of the most
interesting lines in Mark Sinker's Sight & Sound review of
Grant Gee's Joy Division film:
Sometimes the names condensed more than one reference: 'Colony'
invoked Conrad as much as Kafka's 'Strike Kolony'. Sometimes the
references were unintentional misdirections; 'Atrocity Exhibition'
is surely one of the least Ballardian tracks that Joy Division
produced. In any case, construing these allusions as 'portals' that
led somewhere – rather than as citations in a seamless postmodern
circuit – is highly suggestive. Such portals could take the
listener into formal education, but were also doorways beyond the
school and the university, an alternative curriculum.
(Also well worth looking at on Owen's site:
this essay on Neu!, published in honour of the recently
deceased Klaus Dinger.)
Tags: Uncategorized
Satire Is Dead, Again
Mark Fisher
From the team that brought you this:
'Red is more like punk rock, hip hop, this should feel like
hard commerce.'
Tags: Uncategorized
Designer Despair
Mark Fisher
Rousing praise for Portishead's latest amidst Simon Reynolds's
latest bumper pack of reflections on Blissblog. I find Simon's
enthusiasm for the LP a little perplexing, although, I must
confess, I've never been that enraptured by Portishead. I became
quickly fatigued wading through the gloopy designer despair of
their debut, and had all but lost interest by the time of the
follow up. The combination of kitchen sink torch singing, vinyl
crepitation, sweeping film samples and brokeback hiphop beats
possessed a certain stylishness, but the appeal quickly palled. It
was the 'stylishness' that was the problem, actually. Even though I
don't doubt the personal sincerity of either Gibbons or Barrow,
formally it all sounded a little pat, a little too
cleverly contrived, a little too comfortably at home in This
Life 90s Style culture. Gibbons's gloom always struck me as
being more like illegible grumbling than the oblique bleakness it
wanted to be. As for the new album, it screams out lack of ideas:
devoid of the vinyl crackle that might have given it some relation
to the 'hauntological now' of Burial or Philip Jeck, I can only
hear it as clapped out coffee table miserabilism ten years past its
sell-by date.
(Meanwhile, I can't help feeling that
Geoff Barrow and arch smugonaut Mark Ronson are right about
each other.)
Tags: Uncategorized
Weird coincidences...
Mark Fisher
Further to Derek's
observations on Villalobos's 'Enfants', below ... Even though
the sample is taken from a Christian Vander track, when I first
heard 'Enfants' it reminded me of nothing so much as the piano on
Nina Simone's 'Sinnerman'. It seems that I'm not the only
one to make the association ... If the similarity between the
tracks is eerie, then this only adds to the strangeness of Simone's
already intensely uncanny song, which acquired even more weirdness
last year when it was used by both David Lynch (in INLAND EMPIRE)
and Timbaland (on the first track of his Shock Value LP).
Tags: Uncategorized